Marvin notes that the SEC only has authority over securities, which clearly does not include many crypto assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, stablecoins or meme coins. He recalls that the SEC's review of the lawsuit against Ripple showed that transactions on the secondary market with similar assets are also not considered offers of investment contracts.
Ammori points to the court's decision in the
case against Coinbase, where the judge rejected the regulator's contention that crypto wallets could be considered securities brokers. He believes that the same solution applies to the Uniswap protocol. Previously, a judge in one of the trials admitted that the Uniswap platform is mainly used for legal purposes, which, according to the lawyer, means that the regulator’s current exchange rules do not apply to Uniswap.